The International Network for Research on Inequalities in Child Health (INRICH) was created in 2008 by a group of researchers interested in tackling the problem of health disparities among children. The researchers come from various field of studies ranging from medical doctors, social scientists and epidemiologists to economists. view members' profiles...

INRICH Vision

  • To become a valued & productive forum for active researchers in the field of child health inequalities;
  • To be a platform for knowledge synthesis and systematic reviews bringing together evidence related to child health inequalities, equity and policy;
  • To be a platform for collaborative studies among researchers from various field of studies;
  • To play an important role in knowledge transfer to policy makers.

INRICH mission statement : to advance knowledge and research into inequalities in child health and well-being, in child health equity and child policy by establishing a scientific community in which research priorities can be identified, collaborative projects established and new researchers encouraged and to inform policy that will promote child health equity.

INRICH objectives

  1. To bring together international researchers who are active in the area of child health inequalities
  2. To ensure that, in the future, child health inequalities have a higher profile in health inequalities research
  3. To summarise and clarify the current state of knowledge about child health and social inequalities
  4. To promote and initiate research into pathways and mechanisms of child social and health inequalities
  5. To promote and initiate research into trends in child health equity and mechanisms by which equity can be achieved
  6. To promote and initiate research into policy approaches to achieving child health equity by working with decision-makers and stakeholders outside the research community.

INRICH Research Priorities

We identified the following research priorities that can be conducted by members of our network:

1. Pathways and mechanisms

  • Cumulative and additive social risk exposures (e.g. transient v. persistent poverty);
  • Stress and allostatic load;
  • Social into the biological and epigenetic;
  • Intergenerational influences

2. Methodological issues

  • Methods for examining change over time including longitudinal effects studies
  • Need to define poverty
  • Need to study social gradients as well as poverty
  • Multi-level studies - Society, Family & Individual
  • Regional studies (within countries)
  • Which indicators?: for example, perception of health vs. objective measures of health (these may be more reliable in studying mechanisms)
  • Root cause analysis to inform policy change.

3. Interventions

  • Children’s rights & equity – research into effective use as tools to reduce child health inequalities Policy innovation
  • What works in reducing child health inequalities?

INRICH International Projects/Comparisons

We strongly encourage collaborative works that are conducted in a comparative basis within or between countries. The following is a list of non exhaustive potential topics of great interest to our members.

  • Societal and policy level influences – what kinds of societies promote child well-being and why?
  • Examples: role of wealth transfer; comparing social gradients in child health outcomes across countries; role of paid maternity leave; role of breastfeeding promotion; using LCHD framework to explore how policy in different countries impact on children’s developmental trajectories
  • Comparing social gradients in perinatal health indicators, in different countries. Risks differences versus risk ratios. (Nick & Anders to explore)
  • Policies and their relationship to health outcomes. Funding being applied for and would welcome collaborators to study data
  • Design study using standard measures in, for example, 2 neighborhoods in Montreal, 2 in Brazil, 2 in UK.
  • Studies based on current cohorts – comparative secondary analysis of outcomes and relationships with social phenomena (extension of Dr. Louise Seguin and Dr. Nicholas Spencer’s work using ELDEQ & UKMCS)
  • Studies on impact of current international situation: changes in economy, families moved into poverty, impact on children’s health and well-being
  • Studies of safety nets in different countries
PAGES
meetings

Upcoming

November 3-5, 2010

Third INRICH Workshop
IMIP, Recife, Brazil

Preliminary agenda

Download Registration Form
[ PDF ] or [ WORD ]

IMIP Web site
Info on Recife
Info on Getting a Visa to Brazil
Visto Brazil


Past

First WiZiQ Virtual Meeting
(February 15, 2010)

Download Minutes
Download Agenda
Document for discussion: Stress & child health inequalities, Professor Nick Spencer

~

Second INRICH Workshop
(November 6 & 7, 2009)

Download Report
Download Presentations

~

First Teleconference
(June 18, 2009 - 1:00 PM EDT)

Download - Report / Minutes
Download - Objectives, Agenda, Rules & Instructions


Resources

Publications

Barros, A. J., A. Matijasevich, et al. (2010). "Child development in a birth cohort: effect of child stimulation is stronger in less educated mothers." International Journal of Epidemiology 39(1): 285-294.

Professor Sir Michael Marmot (Chair). The Marmot review final report - Fair Society, Healthy Lives. University College London - Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, London UK, February 11, 2010; 242 pages. (proposes new ways to improve everyone's health and reduce "unfair and unjust" inequalities.)

Barbara Starfield. Pathways of influence on equity in health. Social Science & Medicine 64 (2007) 1355–136.

K Maximova, JJ McGrath, T Barnett, J O’Loughlin, G Paradis and M Lambert, "Do you see what I see? Weight status misperception and exposure to obesity among children and adolescents", International Journal of Obesity (2008) 1–8.

Sites

Léa-Roback centre de recherche sur les inégalités sociales de santé de Montréal

Contacts

Lucie Lévesque, coordinator:

inrich@centrelearoback.ca